Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Plastic | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T's global score of 82.2. Galaxy A52's design is newer, just a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Mi 9T. The Xiaomi Mi 9T's processor is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A52's processing unit, they have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a just a bit worse pixels density and a quite smaller screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a very superior storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a bigger camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality and a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Galaxy A52 features just a little bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.