Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's 82.7 general score. The Galaxy A52 design is newer, a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52, although it has a bit lower pixel density, a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a bigger camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a lot more MP back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.