Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2021-03-17 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is better than Xiaomi Mi Max 2's 77.5 score. Even though Galaxy A52 is a little thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, it's lighter and a lot newer. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a bit greater pixel quantity per inch of screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger screen.
The Galaxy A52 has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 counts with a greater camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also has a lot more MP back facing camera, a larger aperture for better low light photography and videos and a much larger camera sensor taking much better quality photos and videos.
Galaxy A52 counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has an 18 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.