Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2021-03-17 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Green |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, getting a 90.7 score against 83.8. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, but both of them are equally thin. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, a little bit smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy A52 counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 has a really longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 takes better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot bigger sensor capturing way better quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.