Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-08-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| -- | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4's general score of 89. The Samsung Galaxy A52 design is somewhat lighter but just a bit thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, and both of them were released only 5 months apart. Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 and Galaxy A52 feature incredibly similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a little bit worse pixels quantity in each inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The Galaxy A52 features a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4's battery performance is very similar to the battery life in Galaxy A52. Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy A52, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting photos and video in low light environments, it also counts with a way better video quality, a camera with lot more mega pixels and a much larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.