Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, having a global score of 90.7 against 84.3. The Galaxy A52 is a incredibly older and noticeably thicker device than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, but Samsung was able to build it lighter anyway. The Galaxy A52 counts with a much greater performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a lot better screen than Galaxy A52, because it has a much higher 2224 x 2488 pixels resolution, a larger screen and a little better number of pixels per inch of display. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 takes a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much worse 50 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher video quality, a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.