Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than the Xiaomi Poco M3, having a 90.7 score against 78.2. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Poco M3, even when both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite higher pixel density. The Galaxy A52 has much more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a back facing camera with much more MP, a way higher (4K) video quality and a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors. Xiaomi Poco M3 has longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.