Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| -- | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, having a 90.7 score against 81.6. Even though the Galaxy A52 and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC were released only a couple of months apart, the Galaxy A52 is lighter and thinner. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little inferior pixel count in each inch in the display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a little bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy A52 features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a camera that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A52 one, and although the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light situations, they both have a back-facing camera with a 64 MP resolution, a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.