Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, having a overall score of 90.7 against 86.1. The Samsung Galaxy A52 construction has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, but it is just a little bit lighter. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A52, because it has a bit bigger screen, a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400px and a just a little better display pixels density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a camera that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A52's camera, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 15 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.