Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| -- | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's 77.1 score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a just a little bit lighter but a little thicker phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. The Galaxy A52 has a really superior performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. They have 8 cores and the same RAM amount.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A52, because it has a just a little greater pixels amount per screen inch, a little bit larger screen and a higher 2080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A52 features a bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB, the Galaxy A52 also has more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's camera is very similar to the camera in Galaxy A52, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for taking images and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A52, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.