Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a general score of 91.5, which is slightly better than Galaxy A52's 90.7 general score. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is newer than Galaxy A52, it's just a bit thicker and a little heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also counts with a quite bigger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a little longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has a 5% larger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a bigger camera aperture for better low light images and video, a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality photos and a way higher 200 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.