Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, with a general score of 90.7 against 75.7. Despite being the best we compare here, Galaxy A52's design is older, just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite worse pixel count per inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a little bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much greater processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro. They have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh. The Galaxy A52 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.