Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, having a 90.7 score against 76.6. Galaxy A52 is a newer phone, and it's also just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 features just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy A52 also has a just a bit higher pixel amount in each inch of display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution. Galaxy A52 features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 12 percent more battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 also has a lot more MP camera, a way better (4K) video definition and a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.