Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 general score. Galaxy A52 is a newer phone, and it is also just a little lighter and just a little thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a quite greater pixels density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A52. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and 6 GB of RAM. Galaxy A52 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro count with really similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a smaller aperture, they both have a 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a same size sensor, the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
The Galaxy A52 has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.