Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's 83 score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a just a little thinner and just a bit lighter phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, even when both of them were only released 2 months apart. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a little faster CPU than Galaxy A52, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a display that is just as good as the Galaxy A52 one, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen, they both have a screen of the same size. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 captures clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and a bigger camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.