Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| -- | Black, Ochre and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, having a overall score of 90.7 against 76.6. The Galaxy A52 design is newer than ZTE Axon 10s Pro's, although it is a bit thicker and a little heavier. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52. They have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a display that is just as good as the Galaxy A52 one, and although the ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a quite lower number of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a same size display. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 counts with a lot better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy A52 counts with a bit superior battery performance than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.