Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-09-01 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro has a global score of 93.3, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A52s's overall score of 91.1. The iPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy A52s comes with Android 11 OS. IPhone 13 Pro's body is just a little heavier but a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A52s, and both were released with only 1 months difference.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density and a quite better 1170 x 2532 resolution. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has 2 lesser cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Galaxy A52s shoots a lot better photographs and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking photos and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a way more megapixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a much better battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.