Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-09-01 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A52s's overall score of 91.1. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with Android 11 operating system. Even though Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy A52s were only released with a couple of months difference, Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max's design is way heavier but just a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A52s.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52s, because it has a bit larger display, a slightly better resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels and a just a bit greater pixel number per inch in the display. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a quite superior performance than Galaxy A52s, because although it has 2 lesser cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features much more memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52s features a bit better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A52s has a lot better camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.