Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-01 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is better than the Apple iPhone XR, with a 91.1 score against 82. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a a little bit lighter phone than the Apple iPhone XR, but they have the same thickness. IPhone XR counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52s, although it has a bit less pixels per inch of screen, a little bit smaller display and a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792px.
Apple iPhone XR features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A52s, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. Galaxy A52s features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy A52s counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 53 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.