Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Blue and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is better than the Google Nexus 6's 81.1 score. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but Galaxy A52s has a newer 11 version while Google Nexus 6 has Android 5.1 version, giving some extra features and performance improvements. Galaxy A52s's design is extremely newer and thinner than the Google Nexus 6's, although it is a bit heavier.
Google Nexus 6 features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52s, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM and lesser CPU cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor. Google Nexus 6 counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each display inch and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A52s features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52s captures way better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images and video and a way more mega pixels camera.
Galaxy A52s counts with a superior battery performance than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3220mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.