Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is better than the Google Pixel 3, having a 91.1 score against 80. Although Galaxy A52s is notably newer than Google Pixel 3, it is notably heavier and a little thicker. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixels quantity in each inch of screen.
The Google Pixel 3 and Galaxy A52s both have extremely similar processors, and although the Google Pixel 3 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A52s captures much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also has a camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy A52s has a much better storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.