Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-01 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is much better than the Google Pixel 3a, getting a overall score of 91.1 against 78.8. Galaxy A52s's body is way newer, but a little thicker and noticeably heavier than the Google Pixel 3a. Both phones in this comparison work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
Galaxy A52s features a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has a greater amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 3a features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater display density.
Galaxy A52s shoots way better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also has a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution and a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A52s features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s features a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.