Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-01 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than Google Pixel 3a XL, with a 91.1 score against 78.9. Samsung Galaxy A52s's design is extremely newer than Google Pixel 3a XL's, but it's heavier and just a little thicker. These phones have the same Android 11 OS. Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little higher screen pixel density and a quite larger screen.
The Galaxy A52s has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52s counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A52s counts with better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A52s captures much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same video definition, a same size aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A52s also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.