Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than Google Pixel 4, getting a global score of 91.1 against 81.9. The Samsung Galaxy A52s body is newer than Google Pixel 4's, although it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Google Pixel 4 has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2280px resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels quantity per display inch.
Google Pixel 4 counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52s. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. The Galaxy A52s features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB and more internal storage.
The Galaxy A52s captures a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a much bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera with a way higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 61% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.