Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is better than the Honor 50 Pro's 77 score. Both devices in this comparison include the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Samsung Galaxy A52s is an a little bit thicker and a bit heavier cellphone than the Honor 50 Pro. The Honor 50 Pro has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a just a bit greater number of pixels per inch of screen, a quite bigger display and a little bit higher 1236 x 2676px resolution.
The Galaxy A52s features a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. Honor 50 Pro features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 50 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features just a little bit longer battery duration than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Honor 50 Pro's camera is very similar to the camera in Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although the Honor 50 Pro has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.