Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 global score. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy A52s has newer 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, so it gives you some nice extra features. Galaxy A52s's construction is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than the HTC One M9's, although it's also heavier.
The HTC One M9 has a much better looking display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixels count in each inch in the display. Galaxy A52s counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than HTC One M9, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The HTC One M9 features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a GPU. The Galaxy A52s takes much clearer pictures and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy A52s also has a bigger camera aperture for better captures in low light environments, a much larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a back facing camera with much more MP.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a very superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 58% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.