Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-09-01 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is better than the LG G7 ThinQ, having a 91.1 score against 81. Galaxy A52s's design is a lot newer than the LG G7 ThinQ's, but it is just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy A52s has the older 11 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG G7 ThinQ features a bit better processor than Galaxy A52s, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The LG G7 ThinQ features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a greater number of pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a superior camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light images, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a much bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52s has a much better battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.