Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-01 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is slightly better than the LG G8 ThinQ, getting a 91.1 score against 84.3. The Samsung Galaxy A52s design has the same thickness than the LG G8 ThinQ, but it is somewhat heavier. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has the older 11 version and LG G8 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG G8 ThinQ features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a greater pixels density. The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A52s. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy A52s takes much better pictures and videos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and/or video in low-light environments and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG G8 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with greater battery performance than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.