Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-01 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is much better than the LG G8X ThinQ's 82.7 overall score. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52s has a newer 11 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version, giving a couple nice extra features. Galaxy A52s is a a little lighter device than LG G8X ThinQ, but both of them have the same thickness.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52s. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cores. LG G8X ThinQ features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, a little smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a superior camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a lot better 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A52s counts with a little longer battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.