Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Titan gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is a little bit better than LG K92, having a 91.1 score against 85.4. Samsung Galaxy A52s's design has the same thickness than LG K92, but it is a bit lighter. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has 11 version while LG K92 has Android 10 version, offering a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a just a little greater pixel density. The LG K92 features a bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a little faster CPU than LG K92. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Galaxy A52s features a slightly better camera than LG K92, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 64 mega-pixels resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A52s also has a larger sensor shooting higher quality pictures and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a bit better battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.