Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-09-01 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is much better than LG V30S ThinQ's global score of 82.5. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52s is way newer than LG V30S ThinQ, it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
LG V30S ThinQ features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52s. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Galaxy A52s counts with improved battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Galaxy A52s shoots a lot better videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing pictures in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a lot larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.