Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is better than LG V35 ThinQ, having a score of 91.1 against 81.3. Although the Galaxy A52s is way newer than the LG V35 ThinQ, it's thicker and heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52s. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s takes way better photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot higher resolution camera and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.