Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is better than LG V40 ThinQ's global score of 81.2. Even though Galaxy A52s is noticeably newer than LG V40 ThinQ, it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A52s has a newer 11 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10, so it provides you a couple nice extra features.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A52s. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy A52s takes much better photographs and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a much larger sensor shooting way higher quality photos and a way higher resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a slightly better storage for apps and games than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A52s has greater battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.