Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is a bit better than LG V60 ThinQ's score of 87.6. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 operating system, so both should give very similar operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy A52s construction is newer, lighter and just a little thinner than the LG V60 ThinQ.
LG V60 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a screen that's just as good as Galaxy A52s's screen, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2460px resolution.
LG V60 ThinQ features a bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A52s features a much better camera than LG V60 ThinQ. They have the same sensor size, the same resolution camera, the same aperture, the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.