Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is a bit better than the LG Velvet's global score of 87.1. Galaxy A52s's body is newer than the LG Velvet's, although it is just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy A52s and LG Velvet feature quite similar screens, because although the LG Velvet has a little worse number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
LG Velvet has a processor that's very similar to the Galaxy A52s one, both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Galaxy A52s features a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52s also has a way more megapixels camera and a larger sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
LG Velvet features more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit longer battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.