Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Microsoft |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-09-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 8.82 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Glacier |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2700 x 1800 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 11.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3577mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is better than Microsoft Surface Duo, with a general score of 91.1 against 78.8. Samsung Galaxy A52s's construction is newer and noticeably lighter, but also extremely thicker than the Microsoft Surface Duo. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has 11 version and Microsoft Surface Duo has Android 10 version.
Microsoft Surface Duo counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger display and a better 1800 x 2700 resolution. Galaxy A52s counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52s also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Microsoft Surface Duo has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A52s. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM. The Galaxy A52s captures a lot better photographs and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low-light situations.
Galaxy A52s counts with greater battery performance than Microsoft Surface Duo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3577mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.