Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is better than the Motorola Edge (2024)'s 78.5 general score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison, we must note that it's also an a lot older, a little heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone.
The Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixels number in each display inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a little larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A52s has a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with more storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52s captures better photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same video resolution, a F1.8 aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back.
Motorola Edge (2024) has just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.