Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with a global score of 91.1 against 78.5. Despite being the best device we compare here, Samsung Galaxy A52s's body is older, heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s. They have a display of the same size, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 and the same pixel density.
The Galaxy A52s has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A52s also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a little longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much worse resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.