Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro's 83.4 global score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A52s is older than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it's design is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy A52s has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite lower count of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a little bit larger screen. The Galaxy A52s has a better storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52s counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less MP resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 2 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.