Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 score. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52s has 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14. The Galaxy A52s is a noticeably older, just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier phone than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1256 x 2760px and a little greater pixel number per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a little longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.