Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro's score of 86.3. The Galaxy A52s is a much older, just a bit heavier and a bit thicker cellphone than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A52s has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy A52s features a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a just a bit worse amount of pixels per inch of display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a bit bigger screen.
Galaxy A52s shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality and a lot tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a battery life that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy A52s's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.