Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, getting a 91.1 score against 87.1. Galaxy A52s's body is a little lighter and a little bit thinner than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52s has 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy A52s has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a little larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a way worse resolution camera and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a lot bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A52s, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a battery life that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy A52s's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.