Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is better than the Moto G 5G, with a 91.1 score against 81.5. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A52s has a newer 11 version and Moto G 5G has Android 10, so it counts with a couple nice extra features. Galaxy A52s is a somewhat thinner and lighter phone than Moto G 5G, although both were only released 9 months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a little bit better looking screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy A52s counts with a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G 5G, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52s counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A52s also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52s captures much clearer photographs and videos than Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Moto G 5G features a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A52s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.