Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Surfing blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than Moto G 5G Plus, having a 91.1 score against 82.6. Samsung Galaxy A52s is a newer cellphone, and it's also a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Moto G 5G Plus. Moto G 5G Plus has a display that is just as good as Galaxy A52s's screen, although the Moto G 5G Plus also has a bit bigger display, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a just a little greater pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a little bit better processing power than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A52s shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a bigger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality and a way higher 64 megapixels resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a greater storage for applications and games than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has more internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.