Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-01 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is much better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), with a general score of 91.1 against 79.3. Even when the Galaxy A52s and the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) were released with only a couple months difference, the Galaxy A52s is lighter and just a little bit thinner. Galaxy A52s features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A52s also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a quite higher screen density. The Galaxy A52s counts with a superior camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Galaxy A52s features a bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52s also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a bit better battery duration than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.