Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-01 | 2021-02-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Pastel sky and Phantom black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than Motorola Moto G30, having a 91.1 score against 78.1. Samsung Galaxy A52s's construction is a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than the Motorola Moto G30, although they were only released with a couple of months difference. The Galaxy A52s counts with a more vivid display than Moto G30, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy A52s also has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a higher pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has just a bit more memory for games and applications than Moto G30, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto G30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52s shoots much better videos and photos than Moto G30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same resolution camera, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution.
The Motorola Moto G30 features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A52s, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.