Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2021-12-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Baby Blue and Mineral Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than the Moto G31, having a 91.1 score against 77. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52s and the Moto G31 were only released 3 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A52s design is a bit heavier but just a bit thinner than the Moto G31. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should give the same OS features.
Moto G31 counts with a display that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A52s's screen, because although the Moto G31 has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a bit greater pixel density. The Galaxy A52s has a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G31, and although they both have a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB, the Galaxy A52s also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto G31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has more RAM. Galaxy A52s captures better videos and photos than Moto G31, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52s also has a way higher video resolution and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Motorola Moto G31 counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A52s, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.