Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is much better than Moto G8 Power, getting a score of 91.1 against 76. The Galaxy A52s construction is newer, somewhat thinner and a little lighter than Moto G8 Power. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52s has a newer 11 version while Moto G8 Power has Android 10 version, offering a couple additional features and optimized performance.
The Galaxy A52s has a little bit better performance than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A52s features a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because it has a just a little higher pixels number per inch in the screen, a quite larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52s takes greater pictures and videos than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs and a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G8 Power, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G8 Power has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.