Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-09-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is better than the Motorola Moto G9 Plus, getting a score of 91.1 against 80.5. These devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy A52s has a newer 11 version while Motorola Moto G9 Plus has Android 10 version. The Galaxy A52s is a newer device, and it's also thinner and lighter than Motorola Moto G9 Plus.
Galaxy A52s counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A52s has a bit better looking screen than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a bit better display density.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a little bit better memory for apps and games than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s shoots clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto G9 Plus. Both have a 64 megapixels camera, the same (4K) video quality, a same size back camera sensor, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a same size diafragm aperture.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus features just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.