Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is much better than Motorola Moto G9 Power's 78.6 general score. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52s has newer 11 version while Motorola Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version, giving a couple additional features. Even though Galaxy A52s and the Motorola Moto G9 Power were only released with a couple months difference, Galaxy A52s is thinner and lighter.
Galaxy A52s features a more vivid display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a lot more pixels per display inch. Galaxy A52s has a little bit better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A52s also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a little better processing power than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has 2 GB more RAM. Moto G9 Power counts with better battery performance than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A52s shoots much clearer photos and videos than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and a 64 megapixels resolution camera, the Galaxy A52s also has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.